decay: be in than winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in than winter 1.00
be in summer 0.86
be in weather 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sign, be in weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(decay, be in than winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sign, be in weather)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sign, be in weather)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(sign, be in weather) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(decay, be in than winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(decay, be in than winter)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(decay, be in summer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(decay, be in summer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(decay, be in summer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decay, be in summer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decay, be in than winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(decay, be in than winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sign, be in weather)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(decay, be in than winter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sign, be in weather)