decay: be practically impossible due to temperatures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be practically impossible due to temperatures 1.00
be practically impossible due to low temperatures 0.99
be practically impossible due to extremely low temperatures 0.96
were difficult in andersonville 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condition, were difficult in andersonville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to low temperatures)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to extremely low temperatures)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(decay, be practically impossible due to low temperatures)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(decay, be practically impossible due to extremely low temperatures)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to low temperatures)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to extremely low temperatures)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to low temperatures)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to extremely low temperatures)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(decay, be practically impossible due to temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condition, were difficult in andersonville)