decay: be useful in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in nature 1.00
be useful 0.88
is useful 0.87
be helpful in ecosytem 0.84
is helpful 0.81
be helpful in ecosystem 0.79
be with female nature 0.79
be important to life 0.76
be important in environment 0.75
be important in servicescapes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(decay, be useful in nature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is helpful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(decay, be useful in nature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(decomposition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(decomposition, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(decomposition, is helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is helpful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(decomposition, be important in environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(decay, be useful in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important to life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(decay, be important to life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(decay, be important to life)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(decay, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(decay, be important to life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(decay, is helpful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(decay, is useful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(decay, is useful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decay, is helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(decay, is useful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(decay, is helpful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(decay, is helpful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(decay, be useful in nature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(decomposition, is useful)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decomposition, be useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(decomposition, is helpful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(decay, be useful in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)