decay: be helpful in ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful in ecosystem 1.00
be important in ecosystem 0.94
be important to ecosystem 0.94
be important for ecosystem 0.94
be very important to ecosystem 0.92
be essential in ecosystem 0.92
be helpful in ecosytem 0.89
be important in forest ecosystem 0.87
be important to forest ecosystem 0.87
be vital in ecosystems 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(process, be very important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(process, be very important to ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(process, be very important to ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(process, be very important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(decay, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosytem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(process, be very important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(decay, be helpful in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(process, be very important to ecosystem)