decision: be based on benefits

Related concepts

Parents	recommendation Weight: 0.76 , move Weight: 0.66 , topic Weight: 0.60 , approach Weight: 0.59
Siblings	judgment Weight: 0.65 , withdrawal Weight: 0.61 , roe Weight: 0.55 , boycott Weight: 0.52 , supreme Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be based on benefits	1.00
be based on costs	0.83
be based on expected costs	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(decision, be based on benefits)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(decision, be based on expected costs)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(decision, be based on expected costs)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(decision, be based on expected costs)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(decision, be based on expected costs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(decision, be based on benefits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(decision, be based on benefits) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(decision, be based on benefits)