decorator: wear overalls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.49
, contractor
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, artist
Weight: 0.46
Siblings painter
Weight: 0.33
, carpenter
Weight: 0.32
, architect
Weight: 0.32
, plumber
Weight: 0.31
, stylist
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear overalls 1.00
wear white overalls 0.99
wear white 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear overalls)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white overalls)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(plumber, wear overalls)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(plumber, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(plumber, wear overalls)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(painter, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(painter, wear overalls)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(painter, wear white overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white overalls)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(decorator, wear overalls)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(decorator, wear white)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(decorator, wear white)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(decorator, wear white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(decorator, wear overalls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(painter, wear overalls)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(plumber, wear overalls)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(painter, wear white overalls)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)