decorator: wear white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.49
, contractor
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, artist
Weight: 0.46
Siblings painter
Weight: 0.33
, carpenter
Weight: 0.32
, architect
Weight: 0.32
, plumber
Weight: 0.31
, stylist
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white 1.00
wear white overalls 0.88
wear overalls 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white overalls)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear overalls)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(plumber, wear overalls)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(painter, wear white overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white overalls)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(plumber, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(plumber, wear overalls)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(painter, wear overalls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(painter, wear overalls)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(decorator, wear white)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(decorator, wear overalls)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(decorator, wear overalls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(decorator, wear overalls)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white overalls)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear overalls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(decorator, wear white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(painter, wear white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(painter, wear overalls)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(plumber, wear overalls)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(decorator, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(painter, wear white overalls)