decrease: be in birth rates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, change
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, amount
Weight: 0.52
Siblings reduction
Weight: 0.36
, decline
Weight: 0.36
, increase
Weight: 0.36
, drop
Weight: 0.35
, rise
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in birth rates 1.00
be in birth rates in japan 0.92
be in birth rates in japan problem 0.90
be in heart rate 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rise, be in heart rate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(rise, be in heart rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rise, be in heart rate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(decrease, be in birth rates)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates in japan)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates in japan problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(decrease, be in heart rate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(decrease, be in birth rates in japan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(decrease, be in birth rates in japan problem)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in birth rates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(decrease, be in birth rates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(decrease, be in birth rates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rise, be in heart rate)