deductible: pays work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, health insurance
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.34
, tuition
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.33
, fee
Weight: 0.33
, deduction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
pays work 1.00
pays exist 0.96
is paid 0.86
be paid 0.84
be paid in etfs 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fee, be paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fee, be paid in etfs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(income tax, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(income tax, is paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(fee, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fee, be paid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fee, be paid in etfs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fee, be paid in etfs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(deductible, pays work)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deductible, pays exist)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(deductible, pays exist)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(deductible, pays exist)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays exist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(deductible, pays work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fee, be paid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deductible, pays work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fee, be paid in etfs)