income tax: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
is refunded 0.77
be handled on annuity paid to trust 0.75
affect accrued expenses 0.75
be handled on annuity paid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tax, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(interest, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(income tax, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(interest, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(interest, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(income tax, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(income tax, affect accrued expenses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(income tax, affect accrued expenses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(income tax, affect accrued expenses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(income tax, affect accrued expenses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tax, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(interest, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tax, is paid)