interest: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.65
, income tax
Weight: 0.64
, deduction
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.69
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.53
, playing sport
Weight: 0.51
, accretion
Weight: 0.40
, origami
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
be paid 0.99
be paid work 0.95
is paid first 0.93
be paid on level 0.88
be paid on amounts 0.87
be paid at beginning 0.87
be paid monthly work 0.86
be paid on amounts considered 0.86
be paid on amounts borrowed considered 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(income tax, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(interest, is paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(income tax, is paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(income tax, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(interest, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(interest, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(interest, be paid)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(interest, be paid)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(interest, be paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(interest, be paid at beginning)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest, be paid)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(interest, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(interest, is paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(interest, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)