defendant: be provided with appeals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
, official
Weight: 0.60
, operator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.60
, juror
Weight: 0.36
, victim
Weight: 0.35
, one person
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be provided with appeals 1.00
be provided with criminal appeals 0.94
appeal 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(defendant, be provided with appeals)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(defendant, appeal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(defendant, appeal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(defendant, appeal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(defendant, appeal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(defendant, be provided with appeals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(defendant, be provided with appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, be provided with appeals)