defendant: be provided with criminal appeals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
, official
Weight: 0.60
, operator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.60
, juror
Weight: 0.36
, victim
Weight: 0.35
, one person
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be provided with criminal appeals 1.00
be provided with appeals 0.94
appeal 0.80
prefer federal court 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, be provided with appeals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(defendant, appeal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(defendant, appeal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(defendant, be provided with appeals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(defendant, be provided with appeals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(defendant, be provided with appeals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(defendant, appeal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(defendant, appeal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(defendant, be provided with criminal appeals)