defender: need strength

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.61
, man
Weight: 0.58
, television
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.55
Siblings goalie
Weight: 0.49
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.35
, winger
Weight: 0.34
, striker
Weight: 0.34
, football game
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need strength 1.00
have better ability 0.78
need speed 0.76
have ability 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(player, need strength)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(defender, need strength)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(player, need strength)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(player, need strength)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(striker, need speed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(player, need strength)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defender, need strength)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(striker, need speed)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(striker, need speed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(defender, need strength)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(defender, have ability)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(defender, need speed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(defender, have ability)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(defender, have ability)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(defender, have ability)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(defender, need speed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(defender, have better ability)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(defender, need speed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(defender, have better ability)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(defender, have better ability)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(defender, need speed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(defender, need strength)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(defender, need strength)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(player, need strength)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(striker, need speed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(defender, need strength)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(player, need strength)