defender: have better ability

Related concepts

Parents	game Weight: 0.61 , man Weight: 0.58 , television Weight: 0.56 , player Weight: 0.55
Siblings	goalie Weight: 0.49 , soccer ball Weight: 0.35 , winger Weight: 0.34 , striker Weight: 0.34 , football game Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have better ability	1.00
have ability	0.96
have better heading ability	0.86
have heading ability	0.81
need strength	0.78
has quality good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(defender, have better ability)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(defender, have better ability)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(player, need strength) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(defender, have better ability)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(player, need strength)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(television, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(player, need strength)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(football game, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(striker, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(goalie, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(defender, have better ability)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(player, need strength) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(defender, have better ability)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(defender, have better ability)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(goalie, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(goalie, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(striker, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(striker, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(football game, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(football game, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(defender, have better ability)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(defender, have ability)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(defender, have ability)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(defender, have ability)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(defender, have heading ability)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(defender, need strength)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(defender, have better ability)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(player, need strength)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(television, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(game, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(goalie, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(striker, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(football game, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(player, need strength)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(television, has quality good)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(defender, have better ability) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(game, has quality good)