television: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is bad quality 0.93
is quality 0.91
improve quality 0.84
improve quality of life 0.83
is good now 0.83
is great 0.81
has quality news 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cable, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(channel, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(channel, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(channel, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(television program, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radio, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cinema, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(radio, has quality news)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cable, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(television, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(television, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(channel, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(television, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cinema, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cinema, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(radio, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(radio, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(television program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(television program, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(radio, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radio, has quality news)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(television, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(television, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(television, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(television, improve quality of life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(television, improve quality of life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(channel, has quality news)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cable, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(television program, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cinema, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(radio, has quality news)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cable, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(television, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(channel, has quality news)