television: improve quality of life

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cable
Weight: 0.71
, channel
Weight: 0.71
, television show
Weight: 0.69
, broadcast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings television program
Weight: 0.70
, television series
Weight: 0.69
, radio
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.65
, movie screen
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve quality of life 1.00
improve life 0.97
improve quality 0.96
improve themselves 0.86
has quality better 0.86
is quality 0.84
has quality good 0.83
is bad quality 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
be important to life 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cable, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(television, improve quality of life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(television, improve quality of life)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cinema, improve themselves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(television program, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radio, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cinema, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cable, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(television, improve quality of life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cinema, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cinema, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cinema, improve themselves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cinema, improve themselves)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(radio, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(radio, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(television program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(television program, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(television, improve quality of life)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(television, be important to life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(television, be important to life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(television, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(television, be important to life)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(television, be important to life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(television, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(television, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(television, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(television, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(television, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(television, improve quality of life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cable, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cinema, improve themselves)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cinema, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(television program, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cable, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(television, improve quality of life)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad)