defense: be important in football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in football 1.00
be important in soccer 0.90
be important in basketball 0.88
work in soccer 0.84
be in basketball 0.83
be important in volleyball 0.80
apply to basketball 0.77
be focused on more by coaches than offense 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(position, work in soccer)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(defense, be important in football)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(position, be in basketball)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(defense, be important in football)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(position, be in basketball)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(position, work in soccer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(position, be in basketball)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(position, work in soccer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(offense, be important in basketball)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(midfield, be important in soccer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(position, work in soccer)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(defense, be important in football)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(position, be in basketball)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(defense, be important in football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(midfield, be important in soccer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(midfield, be important in soccer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(offense, be important in basketball)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(offense, be important in basketball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(defense, be important in football)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(defense, be important in soccer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(defense, be important in soccer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in soccer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in basketball)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(defense, be important in basketball)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(defense, be important in basketball)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(defense, be important in soccer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in volleyball)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(defense, be important in volleyball)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(defense, be important in volleyball)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(defense, apply to basketball)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(defense, apply to basketball)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(defense, apply to basketball)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(defense, be important in basketball)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(defense, apply to basketball)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(defense, be important in volleyball)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(defense, be important in football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(position, be in basketball)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(position, work in soccer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(midfield, be important in soccer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(offense, be important in basketball)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(position, be in basketball)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(defense, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(position, work in soccer)