defense: be more clutch than great offenses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more clutch than great offenses 1.00
be much less-valued than offense 0.83
is good offense 0.83
be stronger than offense 0.82
has state offense 0.80
be focused on more by coaches than offense 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(defense, is good offense)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(defense, has state offense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(defense, has state offense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, is good offense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(defense, is good offense)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, has state offense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, has state offense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, is good offense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)