defense: be much less-valued than offense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much less-valued than offense 1.00
is good offense 0.95
be stronger than offense 0.95
has state offense 0.94
be focused on more by coaches than offense 0.89
be more clutch than great offenses 0.83
is good defense 0.77
is defense 0.77
actually work in game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(offense, is defense)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(offense, is defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(offense, is defense)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(offense, is good defense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(offense, is good defense)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, is good offense)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, has state offense)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(defense, has state offense)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(defense, is good offense)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(defense, has state offense)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(defense, actually work in game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(defense, is good offense)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, has state offense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(defense, actually work in game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(defense, be focused on more by coaches than offense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, is good offense)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(defense, actually work in game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(defense, actually work in game)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(defense, be more clutch than great offenses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(offense, is defense)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(offense, is good defense)