offense: is good defense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, crime
Weight: 0.58
, fine
Weight: 0.54
, behavior
Weight: 0.53
Siblings conviction
Weight: 0.60
, barratry
Weight: 0.51
, takedown
Weight: 0.39
, defense
Weight: 0.33
, possession
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good defense 1.00
is defense 0.97
is good offense 0.82
be stronger than offense 0.78
has state offense 0.78
be much less-valued than offense 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, is good offense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defense, has state offense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defense, is good offense)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(defense, is good offense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense, be stronger than offense)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defense, has state offense)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(defense, has state offense)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(offense, is good defense)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(offense, is defense)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(offense, is defense)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(offense, is defense)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(offense, is defense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(offense, is good defense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(defense, be much less-valued than offense)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, is good offense)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, be stronger than offense)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(offense, is good defense)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(defense, has state offense)