defense: win games

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
win games 1.00
win championships 0.86
actually work in game 0.79
change with season 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(position, change with season)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(defense, win games)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(position, change with season)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(position, change with season)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(position, change with season)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(defense, win games)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(defense, win games)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(defense, actually work in game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(defense, actually work in game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(defense, actually work in game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(defense, win championships)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(defense, win championships)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(defense, actually work in game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(defense, win championships)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(defense, win championships)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defense, win games)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(defense, win games)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(position, change with season)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(defense, win games)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(position, change with season)