deflation: be bad for borrowers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for borrowers 1.00
be bad for debtors 0.83
be bad for banks 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for borrowers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for debtors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for debtors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for debtors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for debtors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for borrowers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(deflation, be bad for borrowers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for borrowers)