deflation: be worse than modest inflation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than modest inflation 1.00
be worse than inflation 0.95
be more serious than inflation 0.92
be more dangerous than inflation 0.91
be more harmful than inflation 0.90
be worse for economy 0.82
be bad for economy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be more serious than inflation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(deflation, be more serious than inflation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(deflation, be more dangerous than inflation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(deflation, be more serious than inflation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(deflation, be more dangerous than inflation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be more dangerous than inflation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(deflation, be worse than inflation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deflation, be more dangerous than inflation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(deflation, be more harmful than inflation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deflation, be more harmful than inflation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(deflation, be more serious than inflation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(deflation, be more harmful than inflation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be more harmful than inflation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(deflation, be worse than modest inflation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse than modest inflation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)