inequality: be bad for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for economy 1.00
be good for economy 0.98
be bad for economic growth 0.89
be bad for growth 0.84
be bad for business 0.84
is economic 0.84
is economic problem 0.84
affect economic growth 0.82
be good for society 0.79
related to allocation in economy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for society)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for society)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for society)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for society)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)