inequality: is economic

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.68 , barrier Weight: 0.61 , issue Weight: 0.61 , evil Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.58
Siblings	illiteracy Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.35 , polarization Weight: 0.35 , injustice Weight: 0.34 , overpopulation Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is economic	1.00
be bad for economic growth	0.92
affect economic growth	0.92
is economic problem	0.90
be good for economy	0.85
affect economic inequality	0.85
be bad for economy	0.84
be important from economic standpoint	0.80
related to allocation in economy	0.78
related to allocation economy	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)