inequality: be bad for economic growth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for economic growth 1.00
affect economic growth 0.96
be bad for growth 0.95
is economic 0.92
be bad for economy 0.89
be good for economy 0.89
affect growth 0.88
is economic problem 0.87
reduce growth 0.82
be bad for business 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, reduce growth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(inequality, reduce growth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(inequality, reduce growth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(inequality, reduce growth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)