overpopulation: is economic problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is economic problem 1.00
is economic 0.90
be bad for economic growth 0.87
is global problem 0.86
affect economic growth 0.86
is social problem 0.85
affect economic inequality 0.85
is problem brainly 0.85
be bad for economy 0.84
has state problem 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(inequality, is economic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)