illiteracy: is social problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social problem 1.00
be cause social problem 0.95
is major social problem 0.94
is social 0.88
be problem for society 0.87
is economic problem 0.85
is world problem 0.85
has state problem 0.85
be problem to world 0.85
is big problem 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hunger, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major social problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hunger, is world problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(illiteracy, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(illiteracy, is social)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is social)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hunger, is major social problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)