inequality: be problem for society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem for society 1.00
be good for society 0.89
be in society 0.89
be important in society 0.88
is social problem 0.87
has state problem 0.85
be present in society 0.83
is economic problem 0.82
is problem essay 0.78
is environmental problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(polarization, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(inequality, be problem for society)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for society)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for society)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for society)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(inequality, be in society)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important in society)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in society)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in society)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inequality, be important in society)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be present in society)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(inequality, be present in society)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for society)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(inequality, be in society)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(inequality, be present in society)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inequality, is social problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important in society)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(inequality, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, be present in society)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(inequality, be important in society)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(polarization, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)