poverty: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents violence
Weight: 0.67
, risk
Weight: 0.63
, income
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, income tax
Weight: 0.34
, unemployment
Weight: 0.34
, corruption
Weight: 0.33
, obesity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be problem in madagascar 0.93
be problem in states 0.90
be considered problem 0.88
be cause problem 0.86
be problem in us 0.86
is significant problem 0.86
is social problem 0.85
is economic problem 0.83
be considered social problem 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(violence, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(violence, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(corruption, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(obesity, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(unemployment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(unemployment, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(poverty, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(poverty, is economic problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(unemployment, is social problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(unemployment, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)