corruption: is social problem

Related concepts

Parents	evil Weight: 0.64 , obstacle Weight: 0.61 , crime Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.61 , theme Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bribery Weight: 0.35 , terrorism Weight: 0.35 , fraud Weight: 0.34 , poverty Weight: 0.33 , hypocrisy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is social problem	1.00
is social	0.88
has state problem	0.85
is environmental problem	0.83
fear of is serious problem	0.82
be problem in communities	0.82
be seen as problem	0.81
is significant environmental problem	0.81
be perceived as class problem	0.81
be perceived as working class problem	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(crime, is social)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(crime, is social)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(poverty, is social)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(corruption, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(poverty, is social) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(poverty, is social)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(terrorism, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(terrorism, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(corruption, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(corruption, has state problem)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(corruption, is social)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(corruption, is social)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.00

Typical(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, is social)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Typical(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(corruption, has state problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(corruption, has state problem)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(corruption, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(corruption, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(crime, is social)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(poverty, is social)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(terrorism, has state problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.00

Typical(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.00

Typical(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(crime, is social)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Typical(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Typical(corruption, is social problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)