crime: is social

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social 1.00
is social problem 0.88
is social issue 0.87
affect social media 0.87
be considered social problem 0.86
is social product 0.85
is social fact 0.85
is social phenomenon 0.84
be considered as social justice 0.84
be considered as social issue 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(crime, is social)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attack, affect social media)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attack, affect social media)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is social)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attack, affect social media) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(crime, is social)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cruelty, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is social)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(crime, is social)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(crime, is social problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(crime, is social)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, affect social media)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cruelty, is social)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(crime, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, affect social media)