crime: be considered as social issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as social issue 1.00
is social issue 0.95
be considered as issue 0.93
be considered social problem 0.92
is social problem 0.86
be considered social decision 0.84
be considered as social justice 0.84
is important issue 0.84
is issue 0.84
is social 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is social)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is important issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cruelty, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is social)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is important issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is important issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(crime, be considered as social issue)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(crime, is social)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(crime, is social)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(crime, is social)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(crime, is social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, be considered as social issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cruelty, is social)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is important issue)