violence: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.68
, tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.63
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.62
Siblings poverty
Weight: 0.67
, fire
Weight: 0.62
, robbery
Weight: 0.59
, killing
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
be problem in society 0.85
solve problems 0.81
is issue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(robbery, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(robbery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(robbery, is issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(poverty, is issue)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(poverty, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(violence, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, be problem in society)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(violence, be problem in society)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(violence, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(violence, be problem in society)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(violence, is social problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(violence, solve problems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(violence, is issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(violence, be problem in society)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(violence, solve problems)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(violence, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(violence, solve problems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(violence, is issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(violence, solve problems)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(violence, is social problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(violence, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(robbery, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(robbery, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(poverty, is issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(violence, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)