robbery: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motive
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.62
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.62
, violence
Weight: 0.59
, felony
Weight: 0.54
Siblings kidnapping
Weight: 0.36
, murder
Weight: 0.36
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.36
, homicide
Weight: 0.36
, rape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be considered problem 0.88
is social problem 0.85
be problem in society 0.85
fear of is problem 0.85
fear of is serious problem 0.84
be considered social problem 0.83
be problem in military 0.83
be problem in communities 0.82
fear of is social problem 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, be problem in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(violence, be problem in society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(violence, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(violence, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(violence, be problem in society)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(violence, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(homicide, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(violence, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(violence, be problem in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(homicide, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(homicide, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(robbery, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(robbery, is social problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(robbery, is social problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(robbery, is social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(violence, be problem in society)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(homicide, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(violence, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(violence, is social problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(violence, be problem in society)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)