sexual assault: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.76
, felony
Weight: 0.72
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.72
, assault
Weight: 0.70
Siblings rape
Weight: 0.67
, robbery
Weight: 0.62
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.42
, sex
Weight: 0.38
, unprotected sex
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be problem in military 0.83
is issue 0.78
has state condition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(assault, has state condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(assault, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(assault, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(assault, has state condition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, be problem in military)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state condition)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(assault, is issue)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(assault, has state condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(assault, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(robbery, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(robbery, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sexual assault, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assault, is issue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(assault, has state condition)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(robbery, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assault, is issue)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(assault, has state condition)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)