assault: be problem in military

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in military 1.00
occur in military 0.84
has state problem 0.83
be in army 0.80
is social problem 0.80
increase in army 0.79
be such problem in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, increase in army)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be in army)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, occur in military)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, be problem in military)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sexual assault, occur in military)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, occur in military)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(robbery, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sexual assault, be in army)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be in army)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(sexual assault, increase in army)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, increase in army)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(assault, be problem in military)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(assault, occur in military)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(assault, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(assault, increase in army)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(assault, occur in military)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, occur in military)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(assault, increase in army)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(assault, increase in army)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, occur in military)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(assault, increase in army)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(robbery, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sexual assault, occur in military)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sexual assault, increase in army)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be in army)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)