sexual harassment: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be considered problem 0.88
is big problem 0.88
become problem 0.88
is serious problem 0.86
is social problem 0.85
fear of is problem 0.85
become big problem 0.85
fear of is serious problem 0.84
be considered social problem 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is big problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is serious problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bullying, become problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bullying, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bullying, become problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bullying, become problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(bullying, is serious problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bullying, is serious problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bullying, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bullying, is big problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bullying, become problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bullying, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bullying, is serious problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bullying, is big problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)