obesity: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents health
Weight: 0.70
, eating disorder
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, risk
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.62
Siblings overeating
Weight: 0.37
, bulimia
Weight: 0.36
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, diabetes
Weight: 0.36
, nutrition
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is national problem 0.91
be problem in world 0.90
is big problem 0.88
be such problem today 0.86
is social problem 0.85
be problem for society 0.85
be problem in society 0.85
is growing problem 0.84
cause problems 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(eating disorder, be problem in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(eating disorder, be problem in society)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, be problem in society)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(eating disorder, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bulimia, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(eating disorder, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(obesity, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(eating disorder, be problem in society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(obesity, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(bulimia, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bulimia, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(obesity, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(obesity, be problem in society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(obesity, be problem in society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(obesity, be problem in society)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(obesity, be problem in society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(obesity, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be problem in society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bulimia, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(eating disorder, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(obesity, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eating disorder, be problem in society)