overpopulation: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is problem brainly 0.93
be problem to world 0.89
is big problem 0.88
is major problem 0.87
be cause problem 0.86
is serious problem 0.86
is social problem 0.85
be problem for society 0.85
is global problem 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)