overpopulation: be problem to world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem to world 1.00
is problem brainly 0.92
is global problem 0.91
has state problem 0.89
be problem in countries 0.89
is big problem 0.88
is major problem 0.87
be cause problem 0.86
be problem for society 0.85
is social problem 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)