overpopulation: be problem in countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in countries 1.00
be problem in developing countries 0.94
be problem to world 0.89
is global problem 0.86
be with other countries 0.86
is problem brainly 0.85
be common in countries 0.84
happen more in countries 0.84
has state problem 0.84
happen more in underdeveloped countries 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)