overpopulation: is global problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is global problem 1.00
be problem to world 0.91
is global issue 0.91
is global 0.88
is global concern 0.88
is problem brainly 0.87
be problem in countries 0.86
is economic problem 0.86
is major problem 0.85
be problem in developing countries 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is global)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inequality, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is global issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(illiteracy, is global issue)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(desertification, is global)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, is global)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is global)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, is global issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desertification, is global)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is global)