hunger: is world problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is world problem 1.00
is major world problem 0.93
has state problem 0.90
is major problem 0.88
be in america problem 0.84
be problem in america 0.84
be in world 0.82
be research problem 0.82
be different from problems 0.81
be problem in africa 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be in world)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hunger, is world problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hunger, is world problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(famine, be problem in africa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(starvation, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in world)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(famine, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(famine, be in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hunger, is world problem)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in america)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in america)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in america)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hunger, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hunger, be in world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(hunger, is major world problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(hunger, be in world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major world problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hunger, is major world problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hunger, is major problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunger, is major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(starvation, be in world)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be problem in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(famine, be in world)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(starvation, be problem in africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)