famine: be problem in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, flood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in africa 1.00
be in africa 0.92
be common in africa 0.88
occur in africa 0.88
be in east africa 0.87
persist in africa 0.85
occur in nigeria 0.77
be in nigeria 0.77
be in ethiopia 0.76
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in nigeria)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(desertification, occur in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in ethiopia)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(desertification, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(desertification, be in africa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hunger, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in africa)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(desertification, occur in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(desertification, occur in africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(starvation, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in africa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in nigeria) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in nigeria)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(starvation, be in ethiopia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in ethiopia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(famine, be problem in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(famine, be in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(famine, occur in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(famine, be in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in east africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(famine, be in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(famine, be common in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(famine, occur in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(famine, occur in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(famine, occur in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in nigeria)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(famine, persist in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(famine, persist in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(famine, occur in nigeria)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(famine, be common in africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(famine, be in nigeria)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(famine, be in east africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(famine, persist in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(famine, persist in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(famine, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(famine, occur in nigeria)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(famine, be common in africa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(famine, be common in africa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(famine, be in nigeria)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(famine, be in east africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(famine, occur in nigeria)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(famine, be in east africa)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(famine, be in nigeria)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(famine, occur in nigeria)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(desertification, be in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hunger, be in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(desertification, occur in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in nigeria)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(starvation, be in africa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(starvation, be in ethiopia)