starvation: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cruelty
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33
, dehydration
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is world problem 0.90
be problem for people 0.90
be problem to world 0.89
is big problem 0.88
is major problem 0.87
is social problem 0.85
is major world problem 0.85
is global problem 0.84
be problem in countries 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(hunger, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(hunger, is social problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hunger, is world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hunger, is world problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(dehydration, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dehydration, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(dehydration, be problem for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major world problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(hunger, is major problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(starvation, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hunger, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hunger, is major world problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dehydration, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunger, is major problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dehydration, be problem for people)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)