hunger: is major world problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents desire
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.64
, need
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings famine
Weight: 0.34
, starvation
Weight: 0.34
, thirst
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, ambition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is major world problem 1.00
is major problem 0.96
is world problem 0.93
has state problem 0.85
be in world 0.82
affect world 0.80
be in america problem 0.79
be problem in america 0.79
is global issue 0.78
be different from problems 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hunger, is major world problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(famine, is global issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(starvation, affect world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major world problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(starvation, affect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(starvation, affect world)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(starvation, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in world)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(starvation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(starvation, is global issue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(famine, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(famine, be in world)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(famine, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(famine, is global issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(hunger, is major world problem)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, is world problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hunger, be in world)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in america problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hunger, is major problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hunger, be problem in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hunger, be in america problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hunger, is world problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hunger, be in america problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in america problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(hunger, be in world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hunger, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hunger, is world problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hunger, is major problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is world problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be in world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hunger, is major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hunger, is major world problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(starvation, be in world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(famine, be in world)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(starvation, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(famine, is global issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(starvation, affect world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hunger, is major world problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)