famine: be in africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, flood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in africa 1.00
occur in africa 0.93
be common in africa 0.93
be in east africa 0.93
be problem in africa 0.92
persist in africa 0.88
be in nigeria 0.80
occur in nigeria 0.80
be in ethiopia 0.79
be in north korea 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be in africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in nigeria)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(desertification, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(desertification, be in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hunger, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hunger, be in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(desertification, occur in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(desertification, occur in africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(famine, be in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(famine, occur in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in east africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in nigeria)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(famine, occur in africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in north korea)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(famine, be in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(desertification, be in africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hunger, be in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(desertification, occur in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
...