problem: be research problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be research problem 1.00
be in research 0.89
be important in research 0.88
has state problem 0.82
demand research 0.82
is social problem 0.79
is economic problem 0.79
be problem for society 0.78
be different from problems 0.77
is environmental problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(limitation, be important in research)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(limitation, be in research)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(limitation, be in research)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(limitation, be in research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(limitation, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(limitation, be important in research)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(problem, be research problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(limitation, be important in research)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(limitation, be in research)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(problem, be research problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)